''You will also create further unnecessary work for the...

''You will also create further unnecessary work for the company''

Not if they had done their job in first place.

After the first strike they knew it was coming. What measures were in place to avoid it?
Did they look into ''WHY'' there was a strike and try to rectify it?
Did they utter the words of ''we are not happy either'' at the last AGM in vain?
If not, why did they not try to find the shortcomings and try to rectify these, prior to the next AGM?

Does this display (again) the utter disregard by the company to the shareholders?

You say if there is a second strike, you will see the holdings go down another 50% - i.e., it'd come around 12 cents again.
Was the SP not at 13 cents or so, only a few weeks ago?

They had 12 months to avoid this situation, but chose to wait until the eleventh hour to scramble to get the votes.
Not to mention the display of top 50 shareholders to ''boost'' confidence.

I would not tell anyone how to vote either, but now it has become a choice of either ripping the bandaid off and suffering the quick pain or death by thousands cuts by keeping the ''promise'' mob in.

I still have not voted tbf, happy to wait until the AGM and wait for the rabbit out of the hand if it ever comes, otherwise happy to put my 200 shares to good use.