Good stuff T-Pain, but it still concerns me that cycle reporting...

First 15 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
mimmo

2,252 Posts.

414

14/03/24

12:42

Post #: 72882626
Share

Originally posted by T-Pain: ↑

My two cents.

I'm going to assume that the company is planning on going to market with their first comercial iteration of the high silicon anode being approved for 650 cycles. I don't see why they would have done an outsourced manufacturing run / testing (late last year) if they were still trying to increase the cycling numbers. Last years Annual Report showed 300 cycles was required for medical devices/power tools so 650 cycles should be ample for the likes of Wyon (Cochlear Ear Implant), Varta (Apple Airpods) etc.

500 cycles has always been the threshold for consumer electronics, as show above in the Annual Report. The same report that stated:

The same report stated that we had applied for three seperate government grants which presumably one is for the Pilot Plant and the other two being funding for the two anode Iterations below:
Whilst I wouldn't be surprised if we have already surpassed 1,000 cycles it makes no comercial sense to publicly announce it due to the possibility of government (R&D?) grants.

Expand

Good stuff T-Pain, but it still concerns me that cycle reporting appears "stuck" at 650 cycle. If it's good enough to report success at 500, then 650, why stop there? I would have thought reporting that cycling had reached say 900 at 80% retention, would have captured the imagination of the assembled masses in Florida.

Maybe the following pic from today's presentation hints at why, although I'm applying my interpretation of the graph which maybe way off the mark.

Love to hear others thoughts on this.

ADO Price at posting: 3.9¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
16 Upvote

4 Great analysis

Reply