I think they are relying upon the fact that they are selling hardware not IP.
Brainchip’s AKIDA Pico is IP not a chip.
The thing is Innatera are using RISC-V and are going it alone into the market.
Brainchip is co partnered for RISC-V with Andes Technology the dominant player with 30% of the RISC-V market. Brainchip is also partnered with SiFive for RISC-V.
As to comparisons of the two technologies:
1. They both offer sub 1 milliwatt performance.
2. Pico however does everything that Innatera does but adds:
a) The ability to run noise cancellation SSM b) The ability to run intelligent single purpose SSMs for communicating with white goods - human machine interphase c) Continuous on device learning d) Ability to be retrained or add additional classes on device during deployment e) The ability to add extra nodes if more intelligence is required f) The ability to add extra memory to meet customer requirements
As to why Brainchip was not at this event they are at events in that region hosted by their partner Andes Technology.
Awards are nice but Brainchip won very significant awards with Studio and Accelerator but they did not ensure commercial product success.
My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder
PS: Apart from the less than 1 mWatt claim I could not find anything regarding actual latency published by Innatera
BRN Price at posting:
21.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)