reposted with the misinterpreted verbal removed. ---- Company pr...

reposted with the misinterpreted verbal removed.
----

Company pr hacks trying to shut down debate on this stinker of a result for management.

No director in their right mind should look at that result and be comfortable with the numbers ... Yep, they got it over the line. But for 1.5m votes they go down ...

Similar result puts them in the frame for a renumeration report going down. That's poison. That indicates a rotten culture.

Management were damn lucky that this vote did not hit the business gossip columns ... it was a raid on the company balance sheet having raised money supposedly for a research runway.

Ultimately the vote was swayed because some market participants appear to have more information than others about how this is all supposed to unfold from here. deduction? Maybe. But then we've had honey dripped on us for four years about what's around the corner.

Maligold you seemed happy to suggest the NO votes were a small grouping of tiny holders ... guess what ...

We actually represented as many votes as FUJI .

We actually represented as many votes as Fidelity

Now clearly we've been diluted by the directors themselves, but given we were the only ones buying this stock in the .40s (ross didn't) .... who knows where we'll be next time the renumeration report comes around.

Cyanta did not need this debate. I agree, so don't tell me I should shut up. Tell the directors. The yes voters just rewarded them for bringing it on.