What exactly do you think is wrong with the analogy stevo?
You throw in insults and put downs but you don't seem to have much constructive input. This is your chance.
The analogy is that experts have determined a building is unsound and the advice has been verified and confirmed by more experts. The people using the building reject the advice because they fear it will cost them money.
Linking the analogy to the real world and climate science is where I expect deniers feel confronted. It is far easier for them to launch invective than construct valid counterarguments.
