Share
30,021 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 646
clock Created with Sketch.
08/10/21
11:36
Share
Originally posted by stumpytrunks:
↑
No, stop making statements to suit your agenda. I am saying that if the well successfully flows that they have sufficient liquidity to drill more wells - not contingent on all of those variables/assumptions holding true other than a decent flow rate. Obviously if all hold true then it is cleaner. If it doesn't hold true then they don't drill. It's a very clear binary decision making process from here. Even if it doesn't flow at all they should be able to cover outgoings from cashflow. If not, they have a sizeable market cap that would make a small placement or cap raise a non-event to fortify the balance sheet. I really don't understand your point. There are four options here: It flows well and they have have sufficient liquidity to develop further It flows well and they need to pause for a bit It doesn't flow and they can cover costs It doesn't flow and they need a small placement/cap raise Clearly for holders it is a top down preference flow. For a non holder there is no benefit in wishing for the bottom two unless you have a strong belief in the underlying business and are wishing for a lower entry point. What are you trying to achieve?
Expand
..... hasn't been able to pick a winner in the last ten years.....so he's trying call a loser...that he hasn't already called as a winner....he did that about 6 yrs ago.....lol