365m gas bearing sands, page-23

sb1 - only eni and MEO know the answer to your question.

Having said that:

1 - I'm causing trouble. Of course there is communication (late charge), and if so, the implications of more gas/condensate across the structure is significant.

2 - The GWC. If you look at pre-drill expectations, well design, previously LKG and other indicators, I would suggest that eni did in fact "chase the GWC". eni cannot help that the structure contains so much gas!

3 - CGR or CO2, truth is we don't know. All we have are expectations as a result of LWD data from H-2. I am very optimistic.

I imagine eni and MEO, whether separately or together have already started remapping Heron using the results (stratigraphy, VSP, well control) of HS-1 to calibrate the structural closure of Heron.

I cannot see eni waiting for New Years Day to bed down the NT/P68 farm out commitment.