You still need to provide proof of your outlandish claims that disrupt the stock's status quo?
You need to prove
your own claims for the forum! We're still waiting for that "analysis"?
"
A lot of ramping to try and prevent the SP
slide into the teens."
"See it a lot on
stocks with no fundamentals."
https://hotcopper.com.au/posts/48194226/"
.20 is still way overvalued IMHO."
https://hotcopper.com.au/posts/48183386/Burden of proof (philosophy)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)- "When two parties are in a discussion and
one (that's you) makes a claim that the other disputes, the one (that's you) who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo."
- "
whoever (that's you) makes a claim carries the burden of proof regardless of positive or negative content in the claim"
- "If there is a dispute,
the burden of proof falls onto the challenger (that's you) of the status quo from the perspective of any given social narrative."
The forum is still waiting for you to present anything to substantiate your claims!
You're completely free to post an opinion, just as the forum is completely free to criticise your content (or a complete lack of content in this case).
I've disclosed my identity to the forum! You should too? We'll wait here for you "analysis"?
