A different view ( possibly cynical ).
Ucg produces 30% less CO2 emissions, right
Thats 30% LESS they can trade on the Emission Trading market.
IF , ( here`s where I get cynical )those who will make the most from this trading mechanism DON`T WANT low CO2 emissions then the status quo will remain.( for now at least )
ie... the current coal fired acrid smog poluting stations will make them more money . They then increase the price of electricity ( because of the cost of CO2 ) and YOU and I pay.
What should happen is the Emission Trading Scheme should be eliminated, and the new technologies ( ie UCG etc ) be allowed to compete on a level playing field, and let the market / consumers decide what is best for the country going foward.
With UCG you get cheap syngas, powering a low cost power station for decades. with 30% less emissions.......now that makes sense......does`nt it ?
Cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CXY
- 4 corners tonight
4 corners tonight, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CXY (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & Managing Director
Charles Armstrong
CEO & Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online