Cheers James,re: With respect, the more important point is that...

Cheers James,

re: With respect, the more important point is that this will hopefully be a new beginning for you in being more constructive & not wanting to do everyone down who expresses a different view to yours (have read some of your previous replies to participants !!!!).
------------------------

I do not recall downing anyone who expresses a different view to mine? My issues are that some individuals/posters place extremely misleading and often incorrect information on particular stocks. Unfortunately there are and will be extremely inexperienced members that tend to jump on anything that moves.

I consider being constructive in presenting the facts on certain stocks that I follow at times, not what a poster is "hoping" will happen to their investment.

I am only stating the facts in relation to SML and what information is available in the marketplace. I have no issues with SML, however when people start pumping a 4.0mil + gold resource on a chat site, with no evidence to back it up other than "someone else suggested it", I take an interest.

I ask the SML crew, how they can substantiate a 4 -7 mil oz gold resource at this early stage of exploration?

cheers