Gravy
11340 tons, seems achievable to me.
$2 a pound long term. What absolute rubbish. Any analyst who uses $2 a pound long term should be sacked. Eventually these fools will raise their long term forecast.
Using $2 a pound revenue and $1 a pound costs would mean that almost all new projects would not be approved.
Even a project as good as Oxiana's prominant hill would not get approved in 2010 based on these parameters
4000tpd here we come, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
