Share
1,415 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 366
clock Created with Sketch. 30/04/25
11:23
Share
Originally posted by gastrader:
↑
Moose you said " I know if a couple of people who looked into these shares and were turned off because when they googled 4DS, hot copper came up very early so they dove in to take a look... based on what they read on hot copper, they decided not to invest." So who is really doing the damage? Yes, this is exactly my point Moose ...... although I realise it isn't the point you were trying to make..... I know lots of people who were looking to invest in 4DS,,,, They read (what should have been a positive announcement ) about Infineon....... and were trying to understand why the SP was destroyed....... because it didn't make any sense (unless you knew the background to it) !!! They read the posts on Hot Copper to find out what happened...... they listened to the audio from the AGM (cough cough !!!) ..... all of them could clearly see (from their own research) what management had done to screw things up. They were delighted to read the posts trying to hold management accountable ..... as should happen ! They decided not to invest in 4DS unless there was a change in management or management at least made an attempt to explain the bizarre behaviour (which of course never happened). So who was really doing the damage as you asked ????......the management or the people trying to hold them to account for SP destruction. ??? Is it the management who is getting on with the job, or the lazy HC keyboard warriors who share puff quotes out of context and unwilling to do the work to understand what's going on and then blaming management for not understanding...? Firstly, you are probably in a very small group that think management are doing their job professionally. One of the key responsibilities of a director is to act in the best interests of shareholders. There are many here that have a perfectly valid and reasonable views based on recent history to suggest this may not be the case. Certainly in the absence of any explanation from the company about the debacle over the cap-raise (to name one issue) one is led to that conclusion. To suggest that "people are lazy and unwilling to do the work to understand what is going on and then blaming management for not understanding" .... who the hell do you think you are....... one of Trumps spin merchants ??? I don't know how you can possibly defend management in terms of SP appreciation and communication. YOU clearly understand why he did what he did with the Cap raise....... we would all love to hear it ......just once .... justify it for us all. Also why do you think it is not ok to question the behaviour of management on the forum..... as you correctly say we are supposed to be helping each other create wealth and that includes all NEW investors..... do you plan on misleading all new-comers by not talking about what has happened....... just stick you head in the sand so to speak. company. Criticism of management is not done for the fun of it or just to vent frustration.
Expand
oh Gasser, you Daz & I could have been great buddies in a parallel dimension, even though I'm an insensitive, arrogant pr !ck hey.
(20min delay)