Those are reasonable metrics, I'll go along with...

Those are reasonable metrics, I'll go along with that.

@Khoutam
Its a completely legitimate question that Darren poses. How is it that retail investors know how amazing this technology while the entire semi-conductor industry, with experts, specialists, the existential requirement the business exists in think its not worth acquiring at cheap-cheap price? Why does HJST have a JDA that has so little interest in PL3, PL4, PL5, etc. to explore options and potential?

You say competitors of Infineon are focused on DRAM - they may be, but they are also focused on SOT-MRAM, as are imec our "partner".
https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/bringing-sot-mram-technology-closer-last-level-cache-memory-specifications

Notice anything in these metrics, some are pretty damn similar and in some regards better than what 4DS has provided to market.

The following is also a good read, even though they talk of an SRAM replacement, obviously MRAM is also versatile. In the R&D phase, just like PCMO RRAM which remains unproven for now.

This remains a race (as it has been for the past 8 years) to see who can bring production-ready technology to market that makes sense economically.
The Infineon step is the right step in proving this, along with other unreleased metrics. Which is why its so painful the way DM handled it and if I go back to posts I made 5 years ago - should have been part of the plan all along as I stated back then.. but the up-rampers back then were looking for a quick sale of the memory cell IP.

This remains a gamble and while it could be acquired at any moment, it won't be acquired for anything significant until it can demonstrate everything that industry needs to see.