@tukebay ... Remember the OEM that rejected the tech?? That was the first potential partner, goes back 3 years..
There you go rambling about AS a director of the company. Can you point to a director of any company that didn't think their product/process/whatever wasn't the best thing since sliced cheese?? Directors of all companies are basically salesmen, selling the sizzle..
You made the comment about the product being unique, as you have done before, yet when challenged keep deflecting to everything else, because you have nothing to back up your claim of their being anything unique about what the FRG unit produces.
The company itself have NEVER claimed the outputs from the FRG unit are unique, so where is the great selling point?? That is apart from the bigger fool that doesn't understand the tech is just an ozone generator in ambient air.
From recent quarterly...
"
recent technology development is under the working title of Hydroplasma"
So is this 'Hydroplasma' now going to have 7 years worth of research like the FRG unit to optimise it??
Trying to find a new use for part of the tech before any sales of the existing tech, is clearly clutching at straws to try and develop something useful/saleable out of an ozone generator in ambient air..
BTW here is a 20 year old publication about pulsed electrical discharges in water, which is what the 'Hydroplasma' is...
https://www.researchgate.net/public...al_discharges_in_water_and_their_applications
"
Pulse corona discharges in water using needle-plate geometry of electrodes (positive needle) produce chemically active species as H,O,OH radicals and Hydrogen Peroxide molecules which can be subsequently used for removal of a low level organic pollutants and micro-organisms from the solution"
Doesn't sound new or unique if it's been known about for decades...
(20min delay)