"Answer: HSM Pty Ltd is the Aust entity that will be 100% owned by MMZ. Therefore all detail revenue in s.ii) goes to MMZ for the first 5 years then a 50/50 split pretty clear IMHO."
that makes sense Arkie, I agree with your statement
But...., why did they split it up into components? Why bother if your statement applies? would seem like a moot point to be making
"Answer: HSM Pty Ltd is the Aust entity that will be 100% owned...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)