I definitely agree with that Joe.
Am I right in thinking then that if they drill (for example) 93000m they have drilled 186 holes each being 500m deep? To that end, are these drills enough to take an "inferred" amount through "Indicated", "probable" and perhaps all the way to "proven"?
I definitely agree with that Joe. Am I right in thinking then...
Add RED (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
43.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.472B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 43.0¢ | 43.5¢ | 42.3¢ | $11.10M | 26.10M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | 420435 | 42.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 43.0¢ | 938103 | 79 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.41pm 03/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
42.5¢ |
Change
0.000 ( 0.96 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 43.0¢ | 43.3¢ | 42.3¢ | 2971631 | ||
| Last updated 13.59pm 03/05/2024 ? | |||||
| RED (ASX) Chart |