Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Life expectancy is irrelevant, population growth is exactly...

First 84 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
nosirommit

1,995 Posts.

27

21/09/17

13:26

Post #: 27369300
Share

Originally posted by blister ↑

its a fare comparison because japan has to characteristics that mimic population growth without actually growing all tbat fast. 1 - japanese people live forever, some of the highest life expectancies in the world. 2 - natural geography hems cities in making space a premium, no urban sprawl in japan. these to factor create artifucial population growth as there is so many people co-located with limited ability to expand. australia similiarly has expanse but we are all colocated in major centers due to centralisation of industry/commerce. the urban sprawl becomes the thing to avoid and thus becomes its own geographical influence. broadly speaking you could safely compare the two.

Expand

Life expectancy is irrelevant, population growth is exactly that. Growth of the population. This stat includes natural increase and decrease.

Tokyo prices have experienced significant gains over the past 4 years.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 81 more messages in this thread...

First 84 Last