50 scientist's speak,verifieable., page-6

40. Dr Tom Segalstad: "The IPCC global warming model is not supported by the scientific data."

Well Dr Segalstad, it would seem that your Norewgian Colleagues completely disagree with you and went on to publish how your do not have a full grasp of the science of climate change. It seems Dr Seglastad gets the basics wrong, with Norwegian Climate researchers rebutting this Norwegian Geologists claims.

CO2-økningen er ikke naturlig
Den pågående økningen av atmosfærens CO2 innhold er ikke naturlig. Tom V. Segalstad feiltolker geokjemiske lover og data, skriver Gisle Nondal, Richard Bellerby og Are Olsen i dette innlegget.
http://www.forskning.no/artikler/2008/august/190368
From the first section of the conclusion < translated , thanks to Google >
Segalstad understanding of atmospheric CO2 increase is not supported in the current scientific literature:
(1) there is no known massive CO2 emissions that can explain Beck's (2007) description of the atmospheric CO2 concentration between 1920 and 1945 rose by 110 ppmv,
(2) theory Endersbee (2008) that atmospheric CO2 increase due to outgassing from the ocean is not consistent with what is observed
Etc etc.