You really have to question how they have spent 55 million on the downstream DFS and and ESG. The upstream dfs is obviously after they do another capital raise. They failed to build stage 2 of the pilot plant in Vietnam that Scott stated would cost the majority of the raise and would of actually generated revenue. Instead construction a temporary plant in Perth.
Seriously how have they spent what they have without achieving significant milestones, sticking to timelines and mothballing exploration.
You really have to question how they have spent 55 million on...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 33 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
