Blog,It "irks" you does it?Really? I suggest rather than just...

Blog,

It "irks" you does it?

Really?

I suggest rather than just sitting their like a baby pigeon on the nest, mouth wide open and complaining of not being spoon fed, you try, just try, to read the material published by IDC in the public domain.

Strangely, perhaps, BLog, the major focus of discussions here with the core of IDC participants seems to relate to the geological structures being drilled, extensions of resources, and, the potential for the discovery of new resources, along with permitting and the move toward production.

Back to your issue, you say it "irks" you.

Ostensibly your "irk" is a germane issue.

It goes to determining the actual interpretive value of an announcement.

Your "irk", the (so called) practice of drilling the (so called) "directors holes", (where a drill hole is down dip and strike) suggests a can asserting that the company is promoting 'grades' over evidence for the potential for an economic addition to a resource, (yes, as differentiated from grades).

You seem to in fact suggest there is a bona fide question going to the credibility of the geologists at Mt Kare and management of IDC.

WELL DONE to you Mr Blog, as the person who raised the question.

HOWEVER, THERE IS JUST ONE VERY SERIOUS PROBLEM I HAVE WITH YOU, Mr Blog.

That goes directly to your credibility.

I know what the interpreted true widths are of all of the mineralized ‘zones’ at Mt Kare, as do many other readers.

A simple reading of what is reported from the company in any particular drill collar would demonstrate that as a matter of practice a particular drill collar will generally have three holes drilled progressively starting at vertical, then 15and/or 30 degrees and/or 45 degrees from the vertical.

Results from all of these holes are reported as is the duty of IDC as a listed company on the ASX.

Why do we know what the results of drilling are and the interpretations given to the outcomes of drilling programs?

Because we (including the unwashed, uneducated, and none too sophisticated) can at least read the IDC published drilling results and geological interpretations of the Mt Kare mineralized zones, including the comments on interpretation of “true width” of mineralization in the enriched zones of the WRZ, BZ, CZ and C9 Pipe.

For your benefit Mr Blog, the mineralized zones in the WRZ, based on drilling, are interpreted as a series of (generally) WNW/ESE belts mineralization of approximately 35-40 meters true width controlled by a listric/thrust fault at their base of about 160-200 meters depth and orientated to a convergence around the C9 pipe.

I suppose this is why IDC are now intensely focussed on the C9 pipe and the Black Zone and the ever more obvious source of mineralization at Mt Kare.

I fond all of this stuff hard work to understand by never the less I and many readers are prepared to put the hard yards in to trying to read, assimilate and understand what this company is doing at Kare.

I can’t speak for others but I take offense to you purporting to assert that there is evidence of non disclosure by IDC when in fact your comments are overtly demonstrable as baseless and lacking any foundation in empirical fact.

Please, actually inform yourself on a topic rather than being "irked" by your own failure to inform yourself least you “irk” others.

Ahhhmmmmmm.