Maybe I'm nuts (and/or biased), but by my philosophy (read), it actually says far more that VLA are not committing to previously indicated 'results release dates' (AACR, MITCI, etc) than it does to 'lock them in' as such (as has been the case for several years), perhaps at BMS's request (particularly for MITCI)...
Any ideas why either party would want to potentially 'supress/delay' results-data, other than it has 'failed' miserably (unlikely considering the stats thus far), in which case, one would expected they'd announce sooner rather than later, like BMS actually did a few months ago for the 'failed' Vervoy/Opdivo combo-trial, which then leaves Merck in 'poll-position' with their existing offer @ A$1.75...
Interested in any alternatives perspectives/views if they're out there...
I guess we'll all see what comes of the UK Conference on 9-12 April, not long now...
ML
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- VLA
- 63 Million Shares traded since announcement
63 Million Shares traded since announcement, page-12
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add VLA (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & Managing Director
Charles Armstrong
CEO & Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online