No offtakes because there's no DFS, and the DFS is imminent.
Why would you put DFS as a CP in offtakes when its so close. Same goes for 1 tonne SC6 product qualification currently in progress. At this stage there's significant projects risks which mean offtakes aren't particularly binding, they're more like agreements to agree.
A big question yet to be answered is how much resource converts to reserve, and this feeds all the calcs driven by minelife, mining & processing rates, etc.
The less CPs in an offtake the better, and this NTA is another boxed ticked and excluded. The board have a lot of short term incentives based on DFS, offtakes, FID, funding hurdles, etc, so an early takeout doesn't suit them - unless of course a cash takeover triggers them anyway, which it could do.
At the end of the day, this is pretty big news and maybe picked us up 4 or 5 cents and stopped us closing below $1.90 again.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LTR
- Ann: Kathleen Valley Project Native Title Agreement
Ann: Kathleen Valley Project Native Title Agreement, page-31
Featured News
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$1.18 |
Change
-0.030(2.48%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.873B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.23 | $1.24 | $1.17 | $10.84M | 9.072M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
13 | 110279 | $1.18 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.19 | 168310 | 29 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
15 | 47074 | 1.175 |
48 | 291697 | 1.170 |
27 | 229527 | 1.165 |
33 | 358201 | 1.160 |
14 | 212466 | 1.155 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.180 | 239778 | 51 |
1.185 | 118708 | 28 |
1.190 | 131706 | 17 |
1.195 | 135425 | 11 |
1.200 | 26490 | 4 |
Last trade - 14.44pm 06/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
$1.18 |
  |
Change
-0.030 ( 3.69 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
$1.23 | $1.24 | $1.17 | 2479363 | ||
Last updated 15.03pm 06/06/2024 ? |
Featured News
LTR (ASX) Chart |