Interesting comments in here about the IPCC process. Or lack...

  1. 15,287 Posts.
    Interesting comments in here about the IPCC process.  Or lack there of.

    A 2008 report sent to the U.S senate

    Keep reading "this is not how we do science"

    Wow the propaganda machine is well oiled.  Oh well slowly it is unwinding

    https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/_...F24A71FEF9DAFCCB056.senateminorityreport2.pdf

    The over 650 dissenting scientists are more than 12 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers.

    mmm  comments from Nobel laureates and other well credentialed real scientist


    “Nature's regulatory instrument is water vapor: more carbon dioxide leads to less moisture in the air, keeping the overall GHG content in accord with the necessary balance conditions.” – Prominent Hungarian Physicist and environmental researcher Dr. Miklós Zágoni reversed his view of man-made warming and is now a skeptic. Zágoni was once Hungary’s most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol.




    “Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.


    Here is a interesting comment from the Editor for the "The Australian Institute of Geoscientists"


    Field Geologist Louis A.G. Hissink is the editor of The Australian Institute of Geoscientists Newsletter and is currently working on the ore-reserve feasibility study of the Koongie Park Base Metals project in Western Australia. Hissink, who earned a masters in geology, recently dissented from man-made climate fears. “The assumption that humanity, from its burning of hydrocarbons, is raising the surface temperature of the earth by affecting its greenhouse effect, is not supported by theory nor the physical evidence. No gas is capable of storing heat so the assumption a gas could is to misunderstand basic physics and the greenhouse effect,” Hissink told EPW on January 21, 2008. “The global mean temperature derivations from the surface meteorological stations confuse the thermal state of the measuring instruments with unspecified volumes of air nor are those temperatures linked to any discrete physical object; in geostatistics this is known as a data set lacking sample support and no more a metric of the earth's thermal state as the mean calculated from the telephone numbers of the meteorological stations producing the temperature readings,” Hissink explained. “Recent discoveries by NASA in the area of space exploration show that the earth is connected to the sun electromagnetically where 25 tens of millions of amperes of electric current are routinely measured during polar aurora displays by satellites - this enormous source of energy, and thus heat, is completely ignored as a factor affecting the earth's thermal balance in global climate models. It is this electromagnetic connection that underpins the solar factor that modulates the earth's climate,” Hissink added.

    Anyway more in it to read.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.