I hate to sound like a moron, but I was under the impression that the SLX technology could re-enrich already used/spend uranium and/or plutonium via it's tech. process? If so then why are these ham-heads crying on the ABC report?
Wouldn't this technology lead to less nuclear/radioactive waste (assuming no melt-downs occur)?
7.30 abc, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$5.11 |
Change
-0.140(2.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.212B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $5.02 | $5.15 | $5.02 | $1.256M | 246.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1427 | $5.11 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $5.14 | 2500 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SLX (ASX) Chart |