I hate to sound like a moron, but I was under the impression that the SLX technology could re-enrich already used/spend uranium and/or plutonium via it's tech. process? If so then why are these ham-heads crying on the ABC report?
Wouldn't this technology lead to less nuclear/radioactive waste (assuming no melt-downs occur)?
I hate to sound like a moron, but I was under the impression...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$4.39 |
Change
0.090(2.09%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.041B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $4.23 | $4.39 | $4.23 | $1.385M | 321.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 418 | $4.38 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $4.40 | 6029 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SLX (ASX) Chart |