I think if the alligation that 7.30 report out line against the...

I think if the alligation that 7.30 report out line against the director of giving contract to people associated Eddy Groves is very distrubing.

In the end there should be transparancy in the company and that should non independent executive directors asking question. Who is watching shareholders interest?

I understand companies make mistake, but in this case there seem to be alot of unlisted entities associated with Eddy Groves taking should holders funds. Who know if these expenses were tendered appropriately.

I think Eddy should go immediately.

Just my opinion do your own research.