7 nuclear power plants for Aus - go LNP!, page-577

I don't dislike Paterson. he's an important contributor to the discussion imo.

"cost are inconsequential"? crikey never thought I'd read that from you old bean.

well, I can't give you a figure and I make it a rule to not react to such questions. I've read this one from several others lately. I figure it's a group thing. not into it myself. but the cost of not reducing emissions is also unable to be told. delaying reducing emissions is as bad as saying No. many highly respected journos, economists, analysts etc have posited the same view that Dutton's plan isn't nuclear but delaying closing coal fired plants.

but aside from that - if Dutton is genuine he will have already done the costings and plans and released them when he made his vague announcement.

thats the point pints.