Why, because the co didin't provide tap density in their latest optimised BAM study? If not, is that necessarily admission of no improvement on previous results? One thing is for sure, it doesn't look as though there was any optimisation undertaken with regards to the mechanical shaping process in an effort to improve tap density anyway. So, it appears that the conventional milling and shaping (the same as adopted up to 2020) remains in use which is surprising. Hope that EGR are ahead of the crowd like Nouveau Monde and others who recognise the need to increase tap density and, in doing so, increase energy storage. I guess that is your point of your questions... an illustration too of how companies fail to cover every base and are not transparent when it comes to providing technical detail.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EGR
- Ann: Change of Address
Ann: Change of Address, page-12
Featured News
Add EGR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
14.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(3.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $65.83M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
15.0¢ | 15.0¢ | 14.5¢ | $4.394K | 30.30K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 112398 | 14.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
15.0¢ | 57234 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 105501 | 0.145 |
3 | 145000 | 0.140 |
5 | 173000 | 0.135 |
4 | 135850 | 0.130 |
1 | 200000 | 0.125 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.150 | 57234 | 3 |
0.155 | 3250 | 2 |
0.160 | 48000 | 2 |
0.165 | 67615 | 3 |
0.170 | 311096 | 3 |
Last trade - 15.31pm 10/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
14.5¢ |
  |
Change
-0.005 ( 3.33 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
14.5¢ | 15.0¢ | 14.5¢ | 43296 | ||
Last updated 15.33pm 10/05/2024 ? |
Featured News
EGR (ASX) Chart |