prospector,
On the contrary, I think I put in some decent, opposing views, some posters actually complimenting my contribution.
I just don't post, 'Jim Rickards says this' or 'Hathaway says that'.
Most of these psychics are has-beens, not a single one has got it right and the despised John Nadler's guesses are more accurate than all the clairvoyants the goldbugs love to praise and follow aimlessly.
If the 'clairvoyants' have got it wrong, I point that out, but the goldbugs will still give thumbs-up to Dub even though he quotes John Hathaway without a moments examination to check whether Hathaway has any credibility.
It must be fairly obvious to the most dyed-in-the-wool goldbugs now that the world financial system is not imploding,and that someone that wrote to George W. Bush advising him on how to run the world shoudn't be taken that seriously.
You know what really bothers you and some of the others prospector? That the gold and silver mania is over and they're becoming increasing irrelevant, which is true.
A 'desperate cry for attention". That's a good one, maybe I just find it a little difficult not to reply to some of the patent nonsense posted here.
If I posted that gold was gonna be $10,000 by the end of the year I'd get lots of thumbs-up and maybe even one from you prospector, but when I point out quite correctly that there's a 40% difference beteween the HUI and gold in the last year, or that someone who says gold and silver are headed for outer space is actually a crank with no credibility, I'm being petulant or 'crying for attention"
Get real.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?