9/11 explosive evidence, page-341

Firstly Chrysalis, the thought that the BBC is complicit in the attacks is very far fetched and as far fetched as people believing planes didn't hit the twin towers.

IF, they did report it 20 minutes before the collapse, is it really a revelation????? A jet ran into it!!!

Mate, it's a revelation if the BBC reported the planes hitting the building 20 minutes before the event. Now that is evidence to support a conspiracy.

AT the end of the day, as we have seen in the latest missing plane, that communication can be wrong or misleading.

One thing we know for a fact is that some floors were on fire and some floors were collapsing. Whose to say someone didn't call media oulets or loved ones saying that the floor above them has just collapsed. And we know that could have easily happened before the building collapsed. It could be pretty easy for reports of a floor collapsing, to parts of the building collapsing to the building has collapsed.

I fail to see how this reporting supports any evidence whatsover.

I remember watching it live and a commentator saying something along the lines that America is under attack and used words like war, just prior to the Pentagon being attacked. Maybe you could find something in that.

Having a news network, out of thousands of news networks reporting a building has collapsed hardly supports your theory.

On Fox last week, someone said that the plane went down near Australia well before other mainstream media outlets reported it and well before the Australian government as well. Does that mean Fox or the person reporting it is complicit with the plane going down????????