Grahod,ahhh...i thought it was science, not opinion:'Someone...

  1. 8,606 Posts.
    Grahod,

    ahhh...i thought it was science, not opinion:


    'Someone with no experience with demolition stating a cut beam was done with thermite is simply opinion. Goodluck trying to sway the wise and intelligent with opinion!'

    - Just like the way one 'and only one' type of explosive leaves the chemistry based (science) residue on steel whenever it meets its flash point - as was found on the bases of all the steel beams at the twin towers.
    Have you tried to reduce that scientific fact down to an opinion yet?

    Such denial going on here and in may other places IMO!
    In my mind, the ones who say it wasn't staged are the ones who are actually conjuring conspiracy theories
    (using evasion as the tool), in order to cover up the coordinated sabotage of the buildings that is already scientifically demonstrated to have occurred.
    Whether or not it was the US Govt., The Rothschilds hit men, "Terrorists", islamic militants, US Air Force, Men in Black, Alien Reptilain Hybrid Changelings, Little Robots, Lochness Monsters, New World Order Disaster Specialists, Smurfs or Elite forces, we may never discover the truth.

    BUT, it is undeniable and evident that Explosives Residues have been located at the bases of the Steel Columns within the buildings, that all filmed free-falling matter related to the collapse of the buildings has been shown to be abnormally characteristic of uncontrolled structure collapse and its been scientifically shown that several other factors that lead up to and which proceeded the bringing down of the Twin Towers was indeed in one way or another premeditated and/or ordered.

    And yet some deny the various examples of order that was indicative of premeditation, the scientifically proven explosive residues, the inabilioty for something to freefall unless it is suspended in mid air and entirely subject to the a lack of inertia and apparant gravitational forces at work along with all the probable, possible and marginal conclusions that many have voiced.

    The reality has dawned that we are all discussing various levels of evidence: Some os is scientific and undeniable yet many people are trying to eplain it in other than scientific terms (madness) , some of it is gossip, some of it is lunacy, some of it is circumstantial, some acts are obviously devious, other are not, some aspects are highly unlikely and many are probable etc.

    And we have a few people out there accross the world who claim that all of the evidence is Black and White.
    That is so Homer Simpson.


    And likewise, not everything we know about is a part of a conspiracy and some of it is co-incidental to the point of being eerie.

    It's an unmistakeable fact that much of, but not all of,
    the circumstances surrounding this disaster have already uncovered evidence that towards sinister human involvement, such as the placement of explosives.

    Pfft to the black and white conditioned sheep out there.
    Haven't you heard, the world is round...nay, eliptical.

    Lesson 1 in life (and the stock market):
    The real truth is a learned thing and it varies depending on who taught it to you.


    L
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.