The whole nine11 scenario is strange. The article just scraps the surface. There are dozen of reasons not to believe the towers crashed because of the plane, however i don't understand what the motive would be? Could the govt really go this far just to secure more funding and reduce civil liberties like the patriot act? From what i read ages ago, they used too much explosives and hence the dust. Yes engineers are scratching their heads wondering how a steel building comes down nearly perfectly and without any resistance! The smoke indicated low temps and fire wasn't the issue. When you watch the video it's hard not to believe that this was anything other than the building being pulled. The towers were designed to withstand a direct hit from a plane (which i find strange also) and of course fell down anyway. The insurance was increased prior to the hit. It seems pretty well planned, however the most strange part is why they demolished the other building. 11 or something. No direct hit of course and it decided to just come down as well. This was a big mistake and unexplained. There was a uni nearby that measured the explosions. A professor was running around the countryside in the states showing the data and timeframes. A career limiting move. The whole scenario is strange, but why was it done? It's clear we have enough mad religious fanatics, why this? Of course open to debate and would prefer to believe a bunch of madmen pulled this off. Problem is it's hard to believe and not just from an engineering perspective.
