oh, I agree that those responsible should be kept away from society---------- no argument there
my argument has always been on the prevention side
all we concentrate on is the revenge side or security side from the ones who have already committed a crime
again ------- it's treat the issue AFTER it's happened
the real bang for the buck lies in working BEFORE these things happen
a concept not easily grasped by Liberals, conservatives and peanuts
progressive parties have hard enough problems dealing with it
personally - I think that mental illness is probably the biggest cost in our entire society - these types of killings are a tiny example of it
we know the figures - 1 in 4 females will suffer from mental illness at some stage in life. 1 in about 5 or 6 males.
we also know that many more males don't appear in those numbers because they end up on grog or drugs - or dead at a young age from risk taking behaviours
all of this ends up in people with no careers, unemployable, criminals, god knows what
we fail badly in these areas ------------ we think it's 'too expensive' to up the budgets massively
well, there's a cost for that - and, this - this is merely one of those costs mostly - to be seen in this case
of course the peanuts would rather summary execution - and, we'd never know why
there's something missing in their heads as well apparently
- Forums
- Political Debate
- 9 yo child murder - death penalty required
9 yo child murder - death penalty required, page-73
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 98 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)