Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

911 it was the Iranians, absolute proof, page-8

First 8 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
thecurious1

27,108 Posts.

9

04/04/16

11:25

Post #: 17414843
Share

Originally posted by Osi ↑

KJ

You need to align your thread titles to your source content. Your thread title says "absolute proof". The content says that (some lunatic judge in New York ) issued an unenforceable award against Iran because "they failed to prove they were not involved". It is a riduculus default judgement based on the fact that Iran doesn't turn up in US courts to defend childish actions. In other words there is no evidence let alone proof or absolute proof of Iranian Government involvement.

Indeed many bloggers are saying that the judge is clueless of ME issues including the fact that there is an actual war between extreme versions of Shia Islam and ultra extreme versions of the Salafi School of Sunni Islam.

cheers

Expand

Not just the judge. With respect to any HC posters from the USA, what % of the USA general population would know that not all Muslims are the same!!
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

HotCopper Highlights, Week 27: G8 scalped, Domino’s drops the box, Gemlife brief hype & more

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

NMG

New Murchison Gold blasts off at Crown Prince as 'better than expected' results return

KGD

Kula picks up unexplored niobium play in Malawi, with surface samples logged

THL

Tourism Holdings says Liberation Day tariffs smashed US RV demand

Week 27 Wrap: 40% China tariffs?; ASX +10% FY25; US Amazon price spike

OSL

OncoSil wraps up recruitment for key pancreatic cancer trial

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

DMP

Is Domino's a steal after -25% plunge?

AII

Inside the Depths of Panasqueira: A Legacy Carved in Rock

First 8 Last

SPONSORED BY