911 - postscript......, page-56

  1. 21,239 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 9

    no emotion my end grahod -

    I will determine the extent to which FEMA was involved, it's a long process I'm afraid, though I've already culled a few choice statements from the FEMA and NIST reports which might set you back a bit - it's just gonna take me a while...

    I don't understand your comment "....we aren't talking about a crime scene as sensitive as a murder one"??????

    clearly it was a murder scene - the lives of three thousand innocent people were taken illegally - I know of no better definition of murder.....


    now let's briefly revisit the Pentagon murder scene.....

    I live close to an airport and I'm used to the regular passage of heavy passenger aircraft close overhead so don't bother looking at them much anymore - however, due to an occasional difference in atmospherics and wind direction etc the sound from those regular aircraft becomes amplified - maybe about twice the loudness I usually hear - I will tell you this, that when such an event does occur, I and others around instinctively look up to see what is going on, or what might be about to happen in the sky - and I'm used to close aircraft noise - it's something you simply can't help doing...... let's now consider the 'airplane' which struck the Pentagon.....

    According to OFFICIAL reports, this terrorist aircraft from a considerable height, maneouvred a 270 degree downward spiralling turn to level out a short distance from the Pentagon and hit the facade of the building approximately 20ft above the ground. This amazing feat being carried out by an arab pilot who, it has been confirmed from flying school instructors assessing the arab pilot's flying skills before renting him a plane, could barely pilot a single engined light plane (a Cessna)...... many qualified Boeing pilots with years of experience flying heavy aircraft have categorically stated that they themselves would barely be capable of such a feat of flying and for anyone not experienced in flying heavy passenger aircraft the idea that such a maneouvre could be executed is simply ABSURD......

    returning to my earlier paragraph of my own experiences living close to an airport - the terrorist 'plane' flying a bare 20ft above the Pentagon lawn with its engines SCREAMING (to which I will return) would have turned every head within a mile radius in its direction....... so why is there not a single eye witness account of an airplane actually hitting the building? yeah, there are accounts of an airplane in the close vicinity I grant you that - but not one which expressly says they saw an airplane hitting the Pentagon. At this time of the morning there would have been hundreds of people out and about going about their business, it's a busy place Washington. Was this plane travelling at the speed of light so it was not observable?????? we are talking about an airplane whose dimensions are:
    length: 155ft wingspan: 124ft height: 44.5ft

    (but we do know what might have been a lot more silent and faster hence been difficult to observe - don't we?..... and such a thing was reported by a woman working in the building - who was later intimidated by 'officials', she's on video.....)

    it should also be mentioned that this supposed 'aircraft' physically knocked over five tall steel lamposts before flying across the front lawn of the Pentagon! - there are plenty of pictures of these tall fallen steel lamposts - but an earlier incident of a similar sized airplane colliding with a SINGLE steel lampost was sufficient to entirely destroy that plane with resulting loss of life and WRECKAGE VISIBLE EVERYWHERE......

    let's return to the screaming engines.... it has been suggested by official versions of the Pentagon attack that the terrorist 'plane' was moving >500 knots when it impacted the Pentagon the normal cruising speed of this type of aircraft is approx 580 mph at 30,000 ft any attempt fly such an aircraft at speeds approaching its high altitude cruising speed at ground level where the air is far more dense would simply shred the wings..... so we know that this very large 'airplane' was not travelling at any speed which would have made it unobservable.... (but again, we know what might have been travelling in such a manner....) then why did nobody see it?????? absolutely unbelieveable!!! and where did two six ton Pratt&Whitney jet turbine engines manufactured from alloy steel and titanium disappear to? they were never found..... officially....

    in any event, whatever hit the Pentagon was most definitely recorded on a number of security videotapes at at least three different sites besides the Pentagon and all confiscated - the fact that the Justice Dept will not release these tapes is clearly CONSPIRATORIAL and criminal..... what could be more simple than releasing these tapes - it has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with hiding the obvious......


    ok grahod - at this point I'm going to say that you are not stupid and that I am not stupid - had you told me ten years ago I would be talking like this about 911, I would have laughed in your face..... but I cannot ignore stark evidence (or perhaps the lack of it in this case)..... you see it's difficult to accept any of this alternative theorising as opposed to the official theorising because of where it takes you - to a very dark place.....

    I'm not sure exactly what my eventual conclusion will be about the events of 911, but of this I am growing more certain, that the United States Government has seriously and criminally misled the world into thinking that a small rag-tag group of Muslim dissidents directed by a leader living in a cave in Afghanistan, could possibly have engineered the collapse of a number of the most important buildings in the heart of America and orchestrated an attack on the Pentagon, one of the most secure buildings on Earth without considerable 'inside' assistance....


    www.ae911truth.com


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.