Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I would be correct that that statement of the 97% is far...

First 4 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
TheColonel

13,184 Posts.

7

26/12/15

12:08

Post #: 16687010
Share

Originally posted by jimcross ↑

Surely we will no longer see reference to the 97% nonsense by the gullible. JX

Revisiting John Cook's 97% climate consensus study. How bad was it?
"If some third world political leader gets 97% of the vote, we know immediately that the vote was rigged and laugh at the naivety of the leader in thinking anyone would believe that figure. Yet Warmists do exactly the same. They are too fanatical to see how absurd they are. Their need to believe has overcome their reason and sense of caution. Their claims are not even good propaganda."

Full article with more links here:
http://antigreen.blogspot.com.au/

JX

Expand

I would be correct that that statement of the 97% is far exceeding that number in terms of BS.
7 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

AAU

Antilles brings Chinese ally on board to keep Neuva Sabana work chugging on

ILU

Rare earths stocks surge as Pentagon buys big stake in US REE miner

VMM

'Big tick': Viridis positions for global leadership with Colossus pre-feasibility study

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

HotCopper Highlights: RIP to Botanix (for now); Droneshield new ATH; Trigg mystery halt

CWX

Carawine faces Fraser Range JV collapse as IGO moves to scrap partnership

Week 28 Wrap: Tariff chaos back for some reason; CBA holds strong

LIS

'Opens doors': Li-S Energy the first Oz company to produce lithium metal foils

Trump just dropped a 200% tariff bomb. Here's how to cash in

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

First 4 Last

SPONSORED BY