Brian, any technology company that employed your proposed strategy has no business being a public company. The market is forward looking and full of greedy people who want to make money based on what a company promises to achieve and not what is has achieved. Welcome to the world of technology stocks.
As for what there is to crow about, maybe you didn't take in the recent releases. How about:
1. A 12 month 40% targeted increase in revenue
2. A targeted $34m decrease in net loss, resulting in profitability.
3. Agreements with industry leaders such as Pitney Bowes and Anixter
4. Expansion into Europe and rest of world (see performance hurdles for the rights recently awarded to directors)
5. Successful management of litigation (see performance hurdles for the rights recently awarded to directors)
6. Just read the prospectus for other points.
TZ: If you are working on a Nasdaq listing, it would be ethical for you to inform the Australian market and let the share price settle to wherever the market decides, despite what may have been promised to institutions in the US. The ends do not justify the means that you may be currently employing.
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
