Thanks for the constructive argument CJSUnfortunately I'm not as...

Thanks for the constructive argument CJS

Unfortunately I'm not as optimistic as you are on this one, fairly simple stuff this for any purchasing officer, don't get me wrong, I'm not against MST being a supply company and if this was the sort of thing that might earn us the 10 -20 million dollar a year base rate for the company to survive then great lets pay a purchasing officer to do the job, and outsource it to a pick and pack mob, bread and butter covered, the rest will be money for jam.

However the fact that we have highly paid management passing this off as a price sensitive announcement is a bit on the nose.

Give it a break! If our weapons are not ready for sale tell us straight. If we haven't got the goods to sell then don't try to fluff this one past us.

To put this announcement out without explanation to market of what the order was for is nothing less than deceptive. Management knew full well that it was deceptive and that it would create a false lift in the share price hence the price sensitive flag!

Was it so that someone could offload some shares perhaps?

Not many share holders are as switched on as Lord Adder, and if it was not for his clever investigation we may never have known what this order was truly for. Perhaps there were other well thought out deceptions to follow. I wonder how many punters were deceived into buying shares at .019 cents to watch them drop back down because there is no real substance to this deal.

Yes Lee goes home with over $4,000 after tax this week whilst another round of nickel and dime Mum and Dad investors are duped out of their hard earned money because of that dodgy spin doctoring rubbish.

My Gripes might bore some to tears but there are worse crimes going on, and questions need to be asked about this sort of behaviour. Especially after the capital raising machinations, that have been recently passed off as management doing the best they can.

The best they can for whom?