grahod,
thanks for the reply & i take your point.
but, "pokies" is just one example of how the money can be wasted, my argument is that the money should be "drip fed" rather than "lump sum" because it reduces the risk of waste.
i'm not for a second saying we shouldn't help the needy, we should, but do it right.
care to differ?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- a $10.4 billion failure
grahod,thanks for the reply & i take your point.but, "pokies" is...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online