I couldn't agree more Scaggs.
I am extremely positive on the technology, everyone here knows that, the reason why I am positive, is all of the stuff that has been found by myself and others over the years points to only one thing! that they are really trying to get a recycling system for UNF in the US up and running, Silex never ever told us that and GLE/GE only mentioned it in passing once or twice maybe, even though this program has been running for pretty much over ten years, (It is a secret supposedly!)
Yes no one saw Fukishima coming, it might also be something else from left field that may upset the apple cart, something like nuclear fusion that works and works well and is easy to build and use, that may give a few here a fright?
But there is one glaringly obvious thing in all of this, the US has a major problem with what to do with UNF, something HAS to be done, no if's no butt's, it appears as if GLE can help solve that problem by around 80% and the other 20% becomes far less dangerous and for a lot shorter time as well, then there is no question that it is going to happen, irrespective of whether a new fusion reactor comes about or not or something else from left field, the problem with the UNF is not going to go away soon by itself, necessity is the mother of all invention so they say?
So even if a new technology is developed that appears to be the ducks nuts, all of the BWR's and PWR's in the US will not be replaced by something new overnight, and the fact they can actually help with the UNF reduction and at the same time produce cheaper power means that they will be used for some time to come, it is a cleanup issue, not just the cheapest method to produce power, although if all of the other issues and a level playing field was used wrt subsidies, nuclear would be somewhere near the best if not the best and one that also helps the environment.
I don't believe I am biased, although I have been accused of it once or twice, I do post anything that I find if it relates to GLE even in some cases if it is negative, I try to keep an open mind about all material that is posted from a number of sources, one of the sources I find the least informative is the stuff that Silex themselves have written, I am not saying they have lied, I have never said that, but I do believe there are things that they have not told us, probably because they are restricted in what they can say? I get that!
But it doesn't help the company by being restricted in what they actually can say, when the truth finally surfaces, there will be a lot of people dumbfounded about how all of this could happen behind closed doors without it getting out into the media, if they had read some of the stuff here they would have known what was happening, and many years ago, but I guess even some of the better educated people here invested in Silex had trouble coming to grips with some of the stuff posted here, I do understand that, they want irrefutable proof in black and white straight from the horses mouth before they act.
After doing all of my research I had to believe what I was seeing otherwise what would be the point?
I did react accordingly and I believe I bought the majority of my shares around the bottom, I do know that there are some that sold at a much higher price and have since bought back in, I congratulate them, I do consider myself not to be a gambler, I would have hated to have sold what I had earlier only to see what was really happening being exposed by Silex soon after, as I said there is little point in doing your own research if you don't believe what you have found, I have always shared what I have found and I will continue to do so, it does worry me sometimes ? especially if all of this doesn't pan out and other have followed me, I don't really see that happening all the same? but I just know there will be some finger pointing if it does.
As they say success has a thousand fathers, failure has none, well maybe one, I am prepared to wear it either way!
Expand
(20min delay)