a bush pre-election strike on iran 'imminent', page-3

Lol enough said its coming out of lebanon - same thing has been said about a strike on north korea that has nukes and nothing but US grovelling.

Isreal is much more likley to launch a missile strike on iran than the US - can you imagine the fallout in terms of political and religious. A strike on iran would stir up pakistan - that would be followed by india - china would get nervous and russia - the eurozone would split from the US - tensions across saudi arabia - would bush really do that despite the fact he is going to get hammered in the poles regardless.

Dont think so it seems the arabs are simply clatching at conspiracy therories and the fact its come out of lebanon well enough said - if the US bombed Iran - iran would invade iraq and kuwait - the US could probably defeat them but it would require in excess of 1M troops + possibly assisstance from turkey, pakistan and their tropps in afganistan.

If bush was to go with that plan he would still lose the election - the US citizens would turn against him and put kerry in.

No a quite run up to the election then bush gone and kerry in - then the US will hasten its pullout of iraq - probably leaving a functioning presense of aroudn 50,000 troops.