re: getrichquick some facts for you My mistake it was corby's defence (not prosecution) that did the poor job
getrichquick
It would appear your lack of reading abilty stems from the fact you are an idiot.
Prima facie case for the prosecution WAS ESTABLISHED.
and as I HAVE NOW PROVEN the onus then fell on the defence to counter the prosecutions case - JUST AS THEY WOULD NEED TO DO IN MOST AUSTRALIAN COURTS.
In corby's case the DEFENCE did a poor job in this area.
Just as in most Australian courts if the DEFENCE performs a poor job in disproving the prosecutiuon's case - THE VERDICT WILL BE GUILTY
Success is a result of planning
not hoping
- Forums
- General
- a fair trial for corby, but not in our media
re: getrichquick some facts for you My mistake it was corby's...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)