a few more details, page-4

Based on the two recent AFR articles the following questions WILL need to be answered:
*Did the accident occur DURING maintenance as initally reported by the company or was it before maintenance began (during routine operation) as quoted by the employees? If the latter then the company has deliberately reported false information to the ASX.
*How can one person die (due to "complications") with others having burns to 90% of their body if the burns were quoted by the company as "second degree burns". Is this further false reporting to the ASX?
*Did the company reasonably expect to have the whole situation sorted and maintance activities completed within the 3 week period as reported? Was I the only one who found this very hard to believe?
*Anyone within ANY experience in a production / process environment would know that Power failures are extremely detrimental. Did management know that the failures had been occuring for some time as reported by the employees, and chose to ignore them? If so then any management who was found to be aware of this should be dismissed immediately.
* Why was fibreglass piping used to carry high temperature sodium sulphate solution in the first place? Based on the information provided this seems unbelievable that a type
of steel piping was not used.