So you are suggesting that if the super conribution rate goes up to 12% every wage earner will take a pay cut to compensate for it? I will stand corrected but that doesn't sound like the Labor way. I thought it was one way traffic. Screw the boss and give everything to the worker. Surely they will never get voted back in if they reduced the hourly rate of each worker?
davomagic
I thought super was introduced to take the pressure off government in providing pensions to an increasingly aging population. The rort is how it is taxed and levied along the way.
