A Lesson on Socialism, page-5

  1. 2,251 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 54
    You can't just give people things that's true but on the flipside do you have the right to withold the means of subsistence from them?
    I don't think there's a simple answer to that one; I personally would be hard pressed to refuse food to starving people yet as a society we do.
    It's overly simplistic to consider that humans brings are motivated purely by wealth, it's peer recognition and mutual aid also. People also create things for the simple pleasure of the idea or the pursuit of perfection.
    I won't deny money is a motivater but only in a base way, to me as my investments gain steam it becomes less and less significant.
    It's also a complete fabrication that wealth in our society goes to those most deserving or who have worked the hardest. Any objective student of corporate governance has to be appalled by what goes on.
    Can we look at two LNG facilities in Queensland exporting gas to Asia for less than it costs in Aus, the massive impairments at BHP. Not to mention the latest vomit inducing 30 page remuneration report for these cock ups or the massive housing bubble fostered by the big banks.
    Finally there's an obsession with wealth in your wee story but maybe we need fewer things and more times with friends and family like Xmas. The cost of all these possessions is not only our happiness but the earth. Once we have emptied the Bingham pit of copper, the pilbara of Iron Ore (transferred to landfill) and the fossil fuels released into our atmosphere/ecosystem how will generations in the future consider our society and what seems to be collective insanity?

    It seems humans were given intelligence but have not yet learned how to apply it.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.