Thanks Puzzled for the research. I started to do a little myself and then got bored. Before I gave it away I looked at 5 months of oral examinations at the start of last year - a sample size of 15 applications.
10 received a positive opinion at the following meeting or the one after that (66%)
All but 3 received a positive opinion eventually (within 6 months of the oral)
4 still had outstanding issues after the oral (all 4 received a positive opinion eventually)
4 received a negative opinion after the oral and all asked for a re-examination. They got it within 5 months but only one of these was ultimately successful
At least 1 application was found not to need an oral after all as they had addressed all the outstanding issues.
Hope all that helps in some way. I agree with Puzzled that we're comparing here against some pretty nasty drugs. As far as I can see CHMP has never required a "device" to go through this oral examination procedure.
Rev
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TIS
- A Little More Research
A Little More Research
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TIS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online