Cheers.
This lack of 'clarity' is why I asked last year is NAG required to inform IF unsuccessful with the current waste tender from the tunnelling projects. Worst case scenario, Given that the company is slow to provide (non-positive) updates, is there a concern that a decision has been made in relation to the winning tender, but NAG is reluctant to comment?
I watch from a distance as the concept of backfilling and the implication for others projects I work with
A New Era, page-72
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 86 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NAG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.169M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.0¢ | 1.1¢ | 0.9¢ | $6.395K | 662.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 3378131 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9¢ | 50000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.00pm 08/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NAG (ASX) Chart |