a picture speaks a thousand words, page-15

I topped up my options and heads
The reason I got on board in the first place has not changed (the sheer scale of GGG's resource base and commodities involved) - what has changed is the entry price.

As far as I am aware the EIS will still be completed before year end and I am speculating that uranium extraction as bi-product will get the go-ahead - my gut feeling only.

I have put money on the line according to my risk level and left room in the basket to top up more yet

The recent sell-off should have caused a much larger down turn in the shareprice but was relatively well absorbed with many buyers accumulating the disposed stock and at some stages even stepping up causing intraday rebounds. This was an encouraging sign and I will re-assess the situation once EIS is completed and meeting concluded in Autumn

Call me oblivious or naive, but I didn't even know who Mick Manynames/Anynames was til I read a post on here recently and googled him up
While he appears to be a 'colourful' character, it should be mentioned that he has been a long-term holder of GGG stock. The only difference between the last 3 years and the last 3 days is that people seem to now know about it. Those people who have a problem with him are now out and if there was going to be a bottom signalled it would be early to mid next week. Jmo. Not ramping. Just saying why I'm in and why I'm still in

I appreciate the contributions of enen and others who originally appeared as antagonists - while it's hard to accept unsavoury circumstances that arise involving a stock you are much infatuated with, when credit is due it should be paid. Let's keep it real, continue to treat each other with respect and make only meaningful contributions on this forum and others - While the posting volume has reduced in the last few days, the quality of the posts has well and truely increased. Let's keep it at the standard it is now folks