Share
489 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 489
clock Created with Sketch. 01/11/20
14:24
Share
Originally posted by stevehud:
↑
After studying the detail in the article linked by you on Dominic Stevens there is a great deal in it to unpack. The connections and personal relationships with other people in the high finance positions as outlined in the article, leads me to believe that indeed the ASX, has been put in a position of having to deliver big time on newer, more advanced operating systems as canvassed by Dominic Stevens. The article touches on his drive and ambition and when that is coupled to his business contacts and prior working roles it paints a picture of success being a necessity. With the never ending blowout in timelines and costs associated with creating a "superior ASX" then it is easy to see that there could be a lot of vested interests outside the walls of the ASX itself. With this information it is logical to see that JK had no alternative but to go via the court system. I am also of the opinion that ASX may well be playing the professional foul card in that it knows it will be penalised, but in their mind the foul is not "Material" to the end game in their own sight.
Expand
Your closing sentence is interesting. I’ve been pondering the same possibility. Are the ASX so deep in there hole that turning back is no longer an option?
