I was just doing some research on the web and stumbled across an article about Richmond Mining (ASX:RHM).
http://www.goldprices.net.au/tag/iron-ore
They are an iron ore producer in the US (listed on the ASX). They just released their DFS in May this year and their project has the following attributes:
- capital expenditure of US$161 million
- output of 1.75 Mtpa
- 10 year mine life
- producing a concentrate grading 66-69%Fe
- cost of production is US$66/t
Compare to PLV, which has
- capital expenditure of AU$700 million
- output of 4.4 Mtpa
- 20+ yr mine life
- producing a concentrate grading ~67%Fe
-cost of production is AU$63/t
So the 2 projects are very similar. PLVs Capex is higher, but it has much greater output and a much longer mine life than RHM. Look at the capex:output ratio:
- RHM: US$92 million per Mt of output annually
- PLV: $AU159 million per Mt of output annually
Not ridiculously higher given that the mine life is twice that of RHM.
And, the icing on the cake is this:
http://www.proactiveinvestors.com.au/companies/news/16507/richmond-mining-lands-financing-from-chinas-hebei-iron-steel-group-for-buena-vista-project-in-nevada-16507.html
Tony is not lying when he says the project is economic. It is looking good!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- a similar project that just got chinese funds
a similar project that just got chinese funds
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PLV (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online